Stewart-Seamster v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Filing
16
FINAL JUDGMENT AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER and Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice as set forth in the 15 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on November 21, 2016. (hnc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
VICKI STEWART-SEAMSTER
v.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-02220-MEF
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
DEFENDANT
FINAL JUDGMENT
This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an
unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding
application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment
by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal
to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The Court, having reviewed the record, the
administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and having heard oral
argument, finds as follows, to-wit:
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of this date, the Court finds that the
decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is supported by substantial evidence, and the same
is hereby affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this the 21st day of November, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Ford
HON. MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?