Bishop v. Bryant et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on April 4, 2016. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION ALLEN BISHOP v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:15-CV-02252 NANCY BRYANT and JAMES BRUTON DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 6) of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 7). Plaintiff’s objections generally express frustration over the Magistrate’s analysis of his claims. Upon due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings and recommendations and that the Magistrate’s report does not otherwise contain any clear error. The Magistrate’s report (Doc. 6) is therefore ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2016. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?