Couch v. Frazier et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 48 Report and Recommendations. Further, granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 45 Motion to Compel ; denying as moot 47 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 31, 2017. (mjm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION RONNIE COUCH v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:16-CV-02035 CORRECTION OFFICER REGI FRAZIER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 48) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Plaintiff has filed objections. The Magistrate recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ motion (Doc. 30) for summary judgment. The Court has conducted de novo review of those portions of the report and recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings. The report and recommendation is otherwise proper, contains no clear error, and is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. 45) and motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 47) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2017. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?