McCarrell v. Fort Smith, Arkansas, City of et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss Party. Claim's against Jeffrey Blue Lum, Fort Smith, Arkansas, City of and Kevin D. Lindsey are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on November 17, 2016. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION RANDA MCCARRELL v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:16-CV-02117 CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS; KEVIN D. LINDSEY and JEFFREY BLUE LUM, each individually and in his official capacity; TERRY COYNE; and CHANNAN, INC., d/b/a Grand Mart Laundromat, a/k/a Grand Mart DEFENDANT ORDER Currently before the Court is the Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss with prejudice her claims against Separate Defendants City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, Kevin D. Lindsey, and Jeffrey Blue Lum. (Doc. 20). It appearing that the parties have settled this matter and are in agreement, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 20) is GRANTED, and her claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because the only remaining claims are state law torts against Defendants Terry Coyne and Channan, Inc., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) “the Court should decline to exercise jurisdiction.” Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 581 F.3d 737, 749 (8th Cir. 2009). It is therefore ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2016. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?