Fowler v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
FINAL JUDGMENT AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER and Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 16, 2017. (mjm)(A copy of the NEF and document, if attached, will be furnished to any non-ECF Case Participant.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
HEATHER M. FOWLER
CIVIL NO. 2:16-cv-2217-MEF
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner, Social Security Administration 1
This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an
unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding
her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final
judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with
any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The Court, having reviewed the record,
the administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and the parties having
waived oral argument, finds as follows, to-wit:
For the reasons announced by the Court on the record on August 11, 2017, the Court finds
that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is supported by substantial evidence, and
the same is hereby affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this the 16th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Mark E.
HON. MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as
the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of
section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?