Pence v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 31

ORDER granting 24 and 27 Motion for Attorney Fees, in the amount of $4149.50. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff and not counsel . Further, adopting 30 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on October 6, 2021. (jlm) Modified on 10/7/2021 to add text (mjm).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION KEVIN L. PENCE V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:20-CV-2152 COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 30) from United States Magistrate Judge Barry A. Bryant. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 24) and his Amended Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 27) be GRANTED and finds that Plaintiff is entitled to an award under the EAJA in the total amount of $4,149.50. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which Plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528 (2010), the EAJA award should be made payable to Plaintiff, but may be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED this October 6, 2021. /s/P. K. Holmes III P. K. HOLMES III U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?