Bridges v. Dowdy et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 12 Report and Recommendations. Further, Plaintiff's 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Joshua Bridges is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b). Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 3, 2021. (mjm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION JOSHUA BRIDGES v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:21-CV-02066 LIEUTENANT CARRIE DOWDY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 12) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Plaintiff has filed objections (Doc. 13). The Magistrate recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b) based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute his case, failure to obey an order of the Court, and failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). None of Plaintiff’s objections address the report and recommendations, however, the Court has conducted de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court finds the report and recommendation is proper, contains no clear error, and is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2021. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?