Bridges v. Dowdy et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 12 Report and Recommendations. Further, Plaintiff's 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Joshua Bridges is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b). Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 3, 2021. (mjm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
JOSHUA BRIDGES
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 2:21-CV-02066

LIEUTENANT CARRIE DOWDY, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 12) from Chief United States
Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford.

Plaintiff has filed objections (Doc. 13).

The Magistrate

recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b) based on
Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute his case, failure to obey an order of the Court, and failure to comply
with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). None of Plaintiff’s objections address the report and recommendations,
however, the Court has conducted de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). The Court finds the report and recommendation is proper, contains no clear error,
and is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2021.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE