Adams v. Bolen et al
ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 63 , and Plaintiff's case is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on August 28, 2009. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION KELWIN DEWAYNE ADAMS v. DONALD KOPPENHAVER ORDER Now on this 28th day of August, 2009, comes on for Civil No. 06-3074 DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63) herein and the Plaintiffs' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 64). The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows with respect thereto. 1. Plaintiff's sole remaining claim1 in this action is his
individual capacity claim against defendant Donald Koppenhavener stemming from an incident on October 27, 2006, when Koppenhavener, in responding to a disturbance in plaintiff's cell, allegedly aimed a gun at plaintiff and threatened to blow his head off if he moved. On December 2, 2008, Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski
conducted an evidentiary hearing on this claim and thereafter issued a Report and Recommendation, finding that Koppenhavener's
M a g is t r a t e Judge Marschewski previously issued a Report and R e c o m m e n d a t i o n recommending that defendants be granted summary j u d g m e n t on plaintiff's other claims. (Doc. 39.) The Court a d o p t e d this Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) and referred p l a i n t i f f ' s remaining claim back to Magistrate Judge Marschewski f o r an evidentiary hearing and issuance of proposed findings of f a c t and recommendations, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
conduct did not violate plaintiff's rights.
Marschewski, therefore, recommended that judgment be entered in favor of defendant Koppenhaver and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed. 2. Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation and the Court has reviewed this case de novo. Plaintiff objects to Magistrate Judge Marschewski's finding that plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Koppenhaver threatened to blow plaintiff's head off. Plaintiff's
objection in this regard does not alter the outcome of this case. As Magistrate Judge Marschewski went on to observe, even if Koppenhaver did point his gun at plaintiff and threaten to blow his head off, there is no evidence that plaintiff was in fear for his life and there were security concerns justifying Koppenhaver
carrying the weapon into the cell there was a disturbance in the cell, the security camera had been covered, and certain inmates in the cell had threatened to lure jailers back to the cell to "jump" them. Further, plaintiff's own testimony establishes that
Koppenhaver made the alleged threat just before he put his gun down so that he could put shackles on another inmate. Thus, while the
Court certainly does not condone Koppenhaver's alleged conduct, it appears that Koppenhaver was simply using a heavy hand in
attempting to secure the inmates and was not acting "`maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm,'" as is required for such conduct to be actionable. Irving v. Dormire, 519 2
F.3d 441, 446 (8th Cir. 2008) (internal citations omitted); Burton v. Livingston, 791 F.2d 97, 100-01 (8th Cir. 1986). 3. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's remaining objections
and finds that they likewise offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation, and the same should be, and it hereby is, adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: * The Report And Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is
adopted in toto and the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. * Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Doc.
65) requesting an extension for the filing of a notice of appeal. An extension is unnecessary, as plaintiff has 30 days from the entry of this order in which to file a notice of appeal. R. App. P. 4(a). Accordingly, this motion is DENIED. See Fed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/Jimm Larry Hendren HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?