Dupont et al v. Fred's Stores of Arkansas, Inc. et al

Filing 23

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on April 29, 2010. (lw)

Download PDF
'1 4-RTD D o c u m e n22-1 Filed04/28/10 Page of 2 t Case3:09-cv-0301 DISTR]CT COURT IN TI{E UNITEDSTATES OF WE S T E RDISTRICT ARKA}ISAS N DIVISION HARRTSON DUPONT ANd PAULADUPONT JAMES PLAINTIFFS N O .3:09-cv-03014 INC, OF STORES TENNESSEE, FRED'S fEgIE qITYUSBDEB AGREED Upongoodcauseshownandbyagreementoftheparries,throughcounsel,the videos, hHndbool(s' records, personnel records, ordrs thdt any colrrpany court herewlth in produced discovery thisCivil in policy manuals otherdocuments or tlEidngmaterials, (collettively-'tie records") from therein, of Action ,includingexcerptB or coDPilations to shallbesubject thefollowingrestictions; (a)'[herccordsofanycopiesoftherecordsshallnotbeoirculatedtoany and the person otherthancounsel, parties, thcCourt' (b) to of The conrents the rccordssbsll not be disclosed any personothcrthan as and couruel,the parties, theCoult exceptfor expertwitnesses dosigrrated b YthePanies. (c) (d) litigation' ofthe instant only for purposes shnltbeused Therecords or of At thc termination this Civil Action,includingall appcals' uponthe htving beentaken' with no aPpeal of e x p i rfl ti o n thc time periodfor aPpeal anyrecordsfumishedbyeitherDefendantanda|lcopiesthereofinthc for shall be rctumedto coungel counsel partics or p o s s e s s l oof opposing n DEFENDA}I'I' P a g eI of? Case 3:09-cv-0301 4-RTD D o c u m e n t 22-1 F i l e d04/28/10 Paoe2 of 2 l h c rtspectivr: Ilcl'r:trdarrto l drstrrrl'cd rvith rvritlun os iflc iotr OT Dcf'endatrt. bcing providc<l ( ) counstlfbr tlrc n:spcctivu l dostructi0rl tt',;, r, S (ortl)r1nlirr. -r flHil\AuyAP|I 201 0, { A g r c c t lunrl yEU .TERN COURT SS,DISTHICT DFrTfl?T AHrnNSAf 2 APB rl t0l0 0 H BR.Joft cLrRK t s s0t{, tr=[*.. wi ffirrrycr*K P a g c rtl l I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?