Marshall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 10

JUDGMENT REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE to Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Further adopting Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on February 25, 2011. (lw)

Download PDF
Marshall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION BETTY J. MARSHALL v. Civil No. 3:09-cv-03071 PLAINTIFF MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Now on this 25th day of February, 2011, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation dated November 30, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation; reverses the decision of the Commissioner, and remands this case to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006). If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED. _/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren_________ HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?