Dillow v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
JUDGMENT REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on June 23, 2010. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION CRYSTAL M. DILLOW v. CIVIL NO. 10-3008 PLAINTIFF
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration JUDGMENT
For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, we conclude that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits to the plaintiff is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed and remanded for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal. If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and cost under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 23rd day of June 2010. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?