Stebbins v. Mid States Promotions et al

Filing 3

ORDER directing clerk to file 1 Complaint and 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Stebbins. Plaintiff is directed to file amended complaint by 5/31/10, as set forth. Further the clerk is directed to send a blank IFP application to plaintiff to complete and return by 5/31/10 as set forth. Failure to comply with this order will result in the summary dismissal of this case. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on May 7, 2010. (lw)

IN THE T]NTTED STATES DISTRICT COT]RT WESTERN DISTRICT' ARKA,NSAS OF HARRISON DIVISION DAVTDSTEBBINS Pt-4.1N1ll.'F

c i v i r N o . 130ql 0"
IONS; M I D S]'AIES PROMO'I and.IASON.IONES DEFENDANTS

OR-DER irctior fbr filing undcrtheprovisionsofthe Americans submittedthjspro.se D a v i d Stebbjns w i t l r Disatrilitics Act. Thc clcrk is directedto fils the in;forma pauperis (IFP) applicationand conrploint. P l a i n t i f f is dircctcd to file an atnendedoomplairrtby May 31' 2010. The amended lbt listcd; (?) indicatewhethorMid States c o n r p l a i n tshoulcl:( l ) have the address eachdel'errdant (3) urtity suchasa corporation; ifMid States Promotionis a co4rotation P r o m o t i o n s a business is the State, court shouldbe providcd o r othcrbusincss entityrequircdto rcgisterwiththe Secretaryof (4) ol'Mid StalesProffotiofls rcgistcredagentfor serviceo1'process; w i t h the uirmeirnd address of heldi (5) haveattached acopyofthe charge discrimination indicate whatpositionJasoTr .Iones a f i l e d witJrthe Equal Emplolment OpportunityConlnission (EEOC);trfld(6) havcattached copy o f thc noticc ol'right 10suereceivedliom thc EEOC. a, W i t h respect tho applioationto proceedIFP, plaintiff ldiled to dolllplctcsubparts b, c, to ou o n d e ofquestion number 3. All infomrationrequested the applicationlbnt is necdcdfor the fot c r r u r t determine plaintil'l'qualilies IFP $tatus.Plaintiff is giveu until May 3l' 2010'to trr il

-t-

AO72A (Rev.8i82)

p r o v i d c the court with a colnpleledIFP applicationor pay the $350 filiug I'ee.The clerk is d i r e c t c dto sendthe plaintiff a hlnnk IFP application, P l a i n t i f f is advisedthat failure to cornply with thi$ order will result in the sunnxflry d i s n r i s s aof this casc. PlaintilT is {iulher atlvisodthat he has an obligation to kccp thrl coutl l retutletl mail, i n f o r t n e d ol'any changes his address.lfhc fails to do so arrdthe colrt reoeives in t h e oase to will be sulriect dismissal.

this 7 dayof May 2010. IT IS SOORDERED

,rsiuefr R. r,rDJp]ftT;cnonu#rlrsnr N . JAX4ES MARSCHEWSKI
10 . MAY 2010
er DEFwq-Fr cl-ERK ct{RlR. s JQt{NsoN,

I I N I T ED STATHSMAGISTRATEJLIDCE

-2-

,AO72A (Rev.8/82)