Brown v. Watson et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, defendants have through 7/15/11 to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. Further ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on July 7, 2011. (lw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
DANIEL RAY BROWN

PLAINTIFF

VS.

CASE NO. 10-CV-3080

YOLANDA WATSON, et al.

DEFENDANT
O R D E R

On

this

7th

day

of

July

2011,

there

comes

on

for

consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case
on June 13, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United
States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas.
24).

(Doc.

No objections were filed to the report and recommendation.
The court has reviewed this case and, being well and

sufficiently

advised,

finds

as

follows:

The

report

and

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.

Accordingly, the following claims are DISMISSED:

(1) all claims against James Williams, a hearing officer for the
Arkansas Parole Board; (2) all official capacity claims against
Kent Villines, Mike Pippin, Mike Thomas, and Yolanda Watson; (3)
all claims challenging the revocation of Plaintiff’s parole and
subsequent

incarceration;

(4)

all

official

capacity

claims

against David Eberhard, Dan Roberts, and Jeff Tillman; (5) all
claims against the City of Harrison; and (6) all claims against
the

Department

of

Community

Probation and Parole Services.

Correction

and

the

Harrison

These claims are frivolous, fail

to state claims upon which relief may be granted, seek relief

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)

against

defendants

who

presently cognizable.
Plaintiff’s

are

immune

from

suit,

or

are

not

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)92)(B)(i)-(iii).

individual

capacity

claims

against

Yolanda

Watson, Mike Pippin, Kent Villines, Mike Thomas, Jeff Tillman,
Dan Roberts, and David Eberhard remain.

Also before the Court

is the Motion for Extension (doc. 37) filed by these Defendants.
The Court finds the Motion should be GRANTED, and defendants
have through July 15, 2011, to file a response to Plaintiff’s
Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)