Brown v. Watson et al
ORDER re 65 in forma pauperis status, the Court directs the Clerk to send the Plaintiff an IFP form, and Plaintiff is given until May 24, 2013 to file the completed IFP application with this Court. Failure to obey the order of the Court will result in an order being entered advising the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that Plaintiff is not eligible for IFP status. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on May 3, 2013. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DANIEL RAY BROWN
Civil No. 10-3080
YOLANDA WATSON, Probation
Officer; MIKE PIPPIN, Assistant
Area Manager; KENT VILLINES,
Parole Officer; MIKE THOMAS, Area
Manager; JEFF TILLMAN, Assistant
Director, Parole Services; DAN ROBERTS,
Director, Parole Services; DAVE
EBERHARD, Director; JAMES L.
WILLIAMS, Hearing Examiner;
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
CORRECTION; and CITY OF
HARRISON; HARRISON PROBATION
and PAROLE SERVICES
By order entered on May 2, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit remanded
this case for the limited purpose of determining Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status (Doc.
70). The Clerk is directed to send the Plaintiff an IFP form. Plaintiff is given until May 24,
2013, to file the IFP application with this Court.
Failure to obey the order of the Court will result in an order being entered advising the
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that Plaintiff is not eligible for IFP status.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of May 2013.
HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?