Brown v. Watson et al

Filing 77

ORDER granting 76 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and directing Clerk to assess the filing fee of $455.00 and collect funds from Prison Account of Daniel Ray Brown. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on July 30, 2013. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION DANIEL RAY BROWN v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 10-3080 YOLANDA WATSON, Probation Officer; MIKE PIPPIN, Assistant Area Manager; KENT VILLINES, Parole Officer; MIKE THOMAS, Area Manager; JEFF TILLMAN, Assistant Director, Parole Services; DAN ROBERTS, Director, Parole Services; DAVE EBERHARD, Director; JAMES L. WILLIAMS, Hearing Examiner; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTION; and CITY OF HARRISON; HARRISON PROBATION and PAROLE SERVICES DEFENDANTS ORDER By order entered on May 2, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit remanded this case for the limited purpose of determining Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status (Doc. 70). On May 3, 2013, an order was entered directing the clerk to send the Plaintiff an IFP form. Plaintiff was given until May 24, 2013, to file the IFP application with this Court. Plaintiff submitted an incomplete IFP application on May 14, 2013 (Doc. 72). An order (Doc. 73) was entered giving him until July 26th to file a complete application. On July 24, 2013, Plaintiff again filed an incomplete application (Doc. 75). Finally on July 26, 2013, Plaintiff filed a completed application (Doc. 76). The motions to proceed IFP on appeal (Docs. 72, 75, and 76) are granted. Pursuant to the terms of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the $455 filing fee from the Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of July 2013. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1- AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?