Aamodt et al v. Norfork, City of

Filing 43

JUDGMENT as set forth in the Order 42 dated 9/27/11. The parties are to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 28, 2011. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION JASON AAMODT and MARIA AAMODT, Husband and Wife V. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 3:10-CV-3088 CITY OF NORFORK, ARKANSAS DEFENDANT JUDGMENT For reasons set forth in the Order filed September 27, 2011, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED. Specifically, Plaintiffs’ Request for Declaratory Relief is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ claims for Freedom of Information Act Violations and Denial of Equal Protection of the Law, are DISMISSED. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The parties are to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2011. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?