Aamodt et al v. Norfork, City of
JUDGMENT as set forth in the Order 42 dated 9/27/11. The parties are to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 28, 2011. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JASON AAMODT and MARIA
AAMODT, Husband and Wife
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-3088
CITY OF NORFORK, ARKANSAS
For reasons set forth in the Order filed September 27, 2011, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21)
is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED. Specifically, Plaintiffs’
Request for Declaratory Relief is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ claims for Freedom of Information Act
Violations and Denial of Equal Protection of the Law, are DISMISSED. All other pending motions
are DENIED AS MOOT. The parties are to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2011.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?