Dunn et al v. Aamodt et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is denied and plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice. Parties to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 18, 2012. (sh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
DONALD DUNN and
KAY DUNN, Husband and Wife, et al.
V.

PLAINTIFFS

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-03119

JASON B. AAMODT and
MARIA AAMODT, Husband and Wife

DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in the Order filed January 18, 2012, IT IS ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, Plaintiffs’
Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ claims are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The parties are to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 18th day of January, 2012.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE