Dunn et al v. Aamodt et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is denied and plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice. Parties to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 18, 2012. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION DONALD DUNN and KAY DUNN, Husband and Wife, et al. V. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 3:10-CV-03119 JASON B. AAMODT and MARIA AAMODT, Husband and Wife DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Order filed January 18, 2012, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, Plaintiffs’ Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The parties are to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 18th day of January, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?