Dunn et al v. Aamodt et al
JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is denied and plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice. Parties to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 18, 2012. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DONALD DUNN and
KAY DUNN, Husband and Wife, et al.
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-03119
JASON B. AAMODT and
MARIA AAMODT, Husband and Wife
For the reasons set forth in the Order filed January 18, 2012, IT IS ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, Plaintiffs’
Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ claims are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The parties are to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 18th day of January, 2012.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?