Guess v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on May 18, 2011. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JIMMY DALE GUESS
CIVIL NO. 10-3124
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
Jimmy Guess (“plaintiff”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial
review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner)
denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). ECF. No.1. The defendant filed
an answer to plaintiff’s action on March 14, 2011, asserting that the findings of the Commissioner
were supported by substantial evidence and were conclusive. ECF No. 5.
On May 18, 2011, the Commissioner, having changed positions, filed a motion requesting
that plaintiff’s case be remanded pursuant to “sentence four” of section 405(g) in order to conduct
further administrative proceedings. ECF No. 9. Specifically, the defendant seeks remand to allow
the ALJ to reevaluate the opinions of Drs. Shannon Brownfield and Stephen Harris; to develop the
record concerning Plaintiff’s drug abuse and perform the proper analysis under 20 C.F.R. §§
404.1535, 416.935; and, to obtain updated evidence concerning Plaintiff’s impairments, including
a mental consultative examination and medical source statements concerning Plaintiff’s limitations.
The exclusive methods by which a district court may remand a social security case to the
Commissioner are set forth in “sentence four” and “sentence six” of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A remand
pursuant to “sentence six” is limited to two situations: where the Commissioner requests a remand
before answering the complaint, or where the court orders the Commissioner to consider new,
material evidence that was for good cause not presented before the agency. The Fourth sentence of
the statute provides that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of
the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social
Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Shalala v.
Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993).
Here, we find remand for the purpose of the ALJ to further evaluate the evidence as
addressed above, appropriate. Therefore, the Commissioner’s motion to remand is hereby
GRANTED and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action pursuant
to “sentence four” of section 405(g).
DATED this 18th day of May 2011.
/s/ J. Marschewski
HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?