Adams v. United States Department of LABOR/OSHA et al
ORDER ADOPTING 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Further denying 30 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 23 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 26, 2012. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DALE B. ADAMS
Case No. 3:11-CV-03043
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR/OSHA; and HILDA SOLIS,
United States Secretary of Labor
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51) filed in this case
on August 13, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate Judge
for the Western District of Arkansas. The objection period has passed without objections being filed
by either party.1
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunction (Doc. 23) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30) is
The Court notes that Mr. Adams did ask the Court on August 10, 2012, in case 3:12-cv03076-PKH, to dismiss “every FOIA case” he had filed with this Court, including the instant matter.
(Doc. 4, case 3:12-cv-03076-PKH). He withdrew that request just 13 days later on August 23, 2012.
(Doc. 5, case 3:12-cv-03076-PKH).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2012.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?