Stebbins v. Hannah et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety ; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 19, 2011. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION DAVID STEBBINS v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:11-CV-03058 JAMES HANNAH; DONALD CORBIN; COURTNEY HENRY; JIM GUNTER; PAUL DANIELSON; KAREN BAKER; and ROBERT BROWN, in their official capacities as justices of the Supreme Court of Arkansas DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) filed in this case on October 7, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations, Plaintiff’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of December, 2011. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?