Stebbins v. Hannah et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety ; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 19, 2011. (rw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
DAVID STEBBINS
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:11-CV-03058

JAMES HANNAH; DONALD CORBIN;
COURTNEY HENRY; JIM GUNTER;
PAUL DANIELSON; KAREN BAKER; and
ROBERT BROWN, in their official capacities
as justices of the Supreme Court of Arkansas

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) filed in this case on
October 7, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for
the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections
being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendations, Plaintiff’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED and
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of December, 2011.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE