Adams v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, and the Court orders this case DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Richard E. Dorr on August 15, 2011. (sh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THN
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISONDIVISION

DALE B. ADAMS,
Plaintiff,

Case t l-3059-CV-S-RED
No.

vs.
TYSON FOOIIS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
Pending
before courtis Plaintiff's
the
Motionto Dismiss.
F'ed Civ. P.al(a)(lXAXi)
R.
states:
Subject Rules
to
23(e),23.1(c),23.2,andandanyapplicable
66
federal
statute,
the plaintif,f, dismiss actionwithouta courtorderby filing: "a noticeof
may
an
dismissal
paftyserves
before opposing
the
eitheran answer a motionfor
or
judgment."
summary
Plaintiff
filedhis Motionto Dismiss March16,?0| | . As ol'March16,201I , no opposing
on
paftyhadserved
judgmentin this matter the
eitheran answer a motionfor summary
or
on
electronic
filing system.
Further,
neither
Rules
23(e),
?3.1(c),
23.2,66,
noranyapplicable
prevent
federal
statute
Plaintil'f
from utilizingRule4lo thuso
Plaintiffs case
may be dismissed
pursuant Rule41.
to
Rule4l(aXlXB) sets
forththeeffects a Ruleal(a)(lXAXi) dismissal states:
of
and
"Unless notice
the
or stipulation
states
otherwise, dismissal without
prejudice."
the
is
Nothingin
thePlaintiff motion
s
suggcsts thedismissal
that
should anything without
be
prejudice.
but

'l'HHREFORE,
is
thiscourtORDERSthatthiscase DISMISSEDWITHOUT
PREJUDICEIT IS SO ORDERBD.

DATE:

A u g u s1 5 , 2 0 1 I
t

/"/

Pi,,hnv,l

F

f)nvv

RICHARD DORR,
E.
JUDGE
COURT
TJNITED
STA'fES
DISTRICl'