Stephens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 5

ORDER denying re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and MOTION for Service. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the order 4 by the specific date of 12/2/2011, to provide more information on his in forma pauperis application. As such plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff is further directed to tender the filing fee of $350.00 by January 3, 2012. If plaintiff fails to comply his complaint will become subject to summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on December 20, 2011. (sh) Modified on 12/20/2011 to add text. (sh).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION ROGER KAY STEPHENS v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 11-3118 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER On November 18, 2011, Plaintiff submitted a complaint for filing in this district, together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. An order was issued directing Plaintiff to provide more information on his IFP application by December 2, 2011. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff failed to comply with the order by the specified date, nor did he request additional time to submit his amended IFP application. As such, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP is denied. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to tender the filing fee of $350 by January 3, 2012. Should Plaintiff fail to comply within the required period of time, his complaint will become subject to summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December 2011. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1- AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?