McCracken v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 8, 2012. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JAMES L. MCCRACKEN, JR.
CIVIL NO. 3:11-cv-03132-JRM
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff, James L. McCracken, Jr., brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),
seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
(“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II
of the Social Security Act. ECF No. 1. Defendant filed an answer to Plaintiff’s action on May
22, 2012, asserting that the findings of the Commissioner were supported by substantial
evidence. ECF No. 7.
On July 23, 2012, the Commissioner, having changed positions, filed a motion requesting
that Plaintiff’s case be remanded pursuant to "sentence four" of section 405(g) in order to
conduct further administrative proceedings. ECF No. 10. Specifically, the Commissioner seeks
remand to remove erroneous medical records and allow the Administrative Law Judge to further
evaluate the medical evidence based on a corrected administrative record. See Def.’s Mot.
The exclusive methods by which a district court may remand a social security case to the
Commissioner are set forth in "sentence four" and "sentence six" of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A
remand pursuant to "sentence six" is limited to two situations: where the Commissioner requests
a remand before answering the complaint, or where the court orders the Commissioner to
consider new, material evidence that was for good cause not presented before the agency. The
fourth sentence of the statute provides that "[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the
pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision
of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing."
42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993).
Here, the undersigned finds remand to allow the ALJ to further evaluate the evidence as
addressed above, appropriate. Therefore, the Commissioner’s motion is GRANTED and the case
will be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action pursuant to sentence four
of section 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of August 2012.
/s/ J. Marschewski
HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?