Davis v. Hickman et al
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 20, 2013. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
MORRIS DEAN DAVIS
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:12-CV-03116
SHERIFF DANNY HICKMAN;
GUARD JASON SILVA;
FORMER GUARD KENDRA COMBS
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 5) from Chief United
States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. There have been no objections.1 After careful
review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed with prejudice as
it is frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2013.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
1
The Court notes that the Report and Recommendation originally mailed to Plaintiff was
returned marked as undeliverable. The Clerk of Court mailed the Report and Recommendation to
Plaintiff’s last known address at Boone County Jail. Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a
current address. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep his address current with the Court. Indeed,
Plaintiff was advised by previous Order (Doc. 3) of this Court that “he is required to immediately
inform the Court of any change of address . . . Failure to inform the Court of an address change may
result in the dismissal of this case.”
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?