Stuart v. Hobbs

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, in their entirety ; and denying 11 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 19, 2013. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION PAUL D. STUART v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:13-CV-03016 RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 13) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. The Court has conducted a careful review of the findings and recommendations and of the timely objections filed by Petitioner Paul D. Stuart. After reviewing the record de novo as to Mr. Stuart’s objections, the Court finds the Magistrate’s reasoning to be sound and further finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrates’ findings. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate are approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Stuart’s motion (Doc. 11) for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2013. s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?