Sayres v. Felts et al
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING IN TOTO 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and plaintiff's objections are overruled; further denying 3 Motion for Hearing; denying 4 Motion for Hearing; denying 7 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 7 Motion for Jury Trial; denying 14 Motion for Order; denying 16 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 16 Motion for Jury Trial; denying 17 Motion ; denying 18 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 20 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 22 Motion to Amend/Correct and case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on January 23, 2014. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
ROBERT SAYRES
PLAINTIFF
v.
Civil No. 13-3096
JOHN FELTS, Arkansas Board of
Parole; SHERIFF MIKE MOORE;
JAMIN B. MARTIN, Parole Officer;
and OFFICER ROBERT CUTBORTH
DEFENDANTS
O R D E R
Now
on
this
23rd
day
of
January
2014,
comes
on
for
consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation
(document #21) and plaintiff's objections thereto. The Court has
reviewed
the
Report
and
Recommendation
and,
being
well
and
sufficiently advised, finds that it is sound in all respects, and
that plaintiff has stated neither law nor fact to refute the
Recommendation.
Further, to the extent that several pending motions -- namely
documents #3, #4, #7, #14, #16, #17, #18, #20, and #22 -- are not
specifically mentioned by the Magistrate Judge, those motions will
be
denied
for
the
reasons
discussed
in
the
Report
and
Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation (document #21) is hereby adopted in toto, and
plaintiff's objections are overruled;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions docketed as documents
#3, #4, #7, #14, #16, #17, #18, #20, and #22 are hereby denied;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the
Report and Recommendation, this case is hereby dismissed with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?