Ohio Casualty v. Union Pacific RR Co, et al

Filing 206

AMENDED JUDGMENT as directed by Mandate from USCA 8th Circuit in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company against Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on February 18, 2009. (cnn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS T E X A R K A N A DIVISION O H IO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF V. Case No. 02-CV-4064 U N IO N PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; LO RI ALLENBRAND; and TRI-STATE C ON TR OL, INC. DEFENDANTS U N IO N PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY V. C R O WLEY INSURANCE, INC.; T W IN CITY FIRE INSURANCE C OM PA NY ; and CASUALTY IN SU RA NC E COMPANY THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS A M E N D E D JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Doc. 198) reversing the judgment (Doc. 187) entered by this Court in the above styled and numbered case and rem anding the action to this Court to enter a judgment in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company ("U nion Pacific"). Thus, the Court abandons its judgment entered on September 21, 2005 (Doc. 187) in fa vor of Ohio Casualty Insurance Company ("Ohio Casualty") and finds that Ohio Casualty had an obligation to defend and indemnify Union Pacific under the insurance policy at issue. Accordingly, the C ou rt hereby enters judgment in favor of Union Pacific in the above styled and numbered case. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of February, 2009. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?