Lynch v. Bayer Corporation

Filing 5

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from Western District of Washington, MDL Panel, remanding case to Western District of Arkansas, with certified copy of docket entries and pleadings (on disk) filed in Western District of Washington Case No. 03-3785, MDL Docket No. 1407. Case reopened.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Docket Sheet)(cap)

Lynch v. Bayer Corporation

Doc. 5

Case 4:03-cv-04114-JLH

Document 5

Filed 03/14/2006

Page 1 of 3
JUDICIAL ANEL N P O M U L T I D I S T B I CIT I G N T I O r u IT

ACEHTIFIEDTRT'EGOPII FEBl-4 2006

6 F E tX ?006

,,.,r1'1,^,'*iJ#ili'i*'*55tt
NO.1407

JAN 6 2006 ?

FILED CLEHK'S FFICE O

0 3-4/t1

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE PHENYLpRopANoLiMrNE(ppA)pRoDUCrsLr,{ffiffritoiffiffi ffi},r^*

(SEEATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONALREMAND ORDERT

MAR 4 2006 |
C1'fiJSN.J#IIISpiCIEN(

"fit

pletrial Th e transfcrce courtin this litigationhasadvised Panel or the that ooorclinated consolidated proceedingin the actions s listedon the attaohed assigned it havebeencomplcted that to and schedule re mand the aotions the transferor of courts, provided 28 U.S,C.$1407(a), appropnate. as to in is IT IS TIIEREFOREORDEREDthat the actionslisted on the attached schcdulcbe romantled thcir to respectve transferorcourts. i IT IS Af,SO ORDER-ED pursuant Rule7.6of theRulesof Procedure the JldieialPanelon that to of Litination,199F.R.D.425,436-38 (2001), transmittal this ordcrto thetransferee the Multidistrict of clerk for frling shallbe stayed fifteendaysfrom thedatsofthis otderandif anypartyfilesa Noticeof Opposition with the Clerkof thePanolwithin this filleen-day period, staywill be continued the until furtherorderofthe Pa nel. This orderdoesnot become effective until it is filed in the oflice of the Clerkfor thc UnitedStates District Courtfor the Westem Districtof Washington. to IT IS FURII{ER ORDERED that,pur$uant Rulc7.6(9),R.P.J.P.M.L,, coinciding with the efTective and da teof this ordet,thepartiesshallfi.tnishthe Clerkfor the We$tem District of Washington with a stipulation of ot designation thc contents ofthe reoordto heremandcd fumishsaidClerkall necessary and copies ollany ple adings othermattetfiled so asto enable or saidClerkto complywith the orderof remand. F O R THE PANEL:

+tr;-a*-0 E"-l\ \
M i c haelJ. Beck C l er k oI'thePanel

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 4:03-cv-04114-JLH

Document 5 IA' Filed 03/14/2006 ATTACHMENT

Page 2 of 3

P A G E1 ofz

S C H E D U L E FOR CONDITIONAL RNMAND ORDER D O C K E T NO. 1407 IN RT]PI'IENYLPROPANOLAMINE(PPA)PRODUCTSLIABILITY I,ITIGATION
.-TRANSFEREE-. I J I S T . D!V. E.A.NO. --TRANS}TROR..DIST. DIV, C.A,NO, ALN 2 ALN 6 ALS I ARE 3 ARW 4 ARIIr 4 ARW 4 ARW 4 cAC ? ILN I LAIJ z MN 0 0 MN MN 0 MOE 4 MSN ? MSN 4 MSS 3 MSS I MSS 3 MSS 3 MSS 3 MSS 3 MSS 5 3 Nv | NYE 0R 3 t'XS 4 VAE 1 LAE 2 1.,1,r\t 3 MSS 2 MSN 4 MSN 4 MSN 4 ALN 2 MSN 4 MSN 4 MSN 4 MSN 4 MSN 4 ALN 2 MSS 2 MSS 5 MSS 5 MSS 5

CASE CATTION

wAw 2
wAw 2

wAw ? wAw 2
wAw 2 wAw 2

w^w wAw wAw wAw wAw

2 ? 2 ? ?

w^v 2
WAW WAW wAw wAw w^w ? ? 2 ? 2

wAw 2 wAw 2 wAw 2

wnw 2 wAw 2
WAW 2 wAw 2 wAw 2

wAw wAw wAw wAw

2 2 ? 2

wAw 2 wAw 2 wAw 2

wnw 2
WAW 2 WAW 2

wnw 2 wAw 2
wAw 2 WAW 2

w^w 2

wnw 2 wAw ?
wAw 2

w^w 2

0?-1509 03-366 03-402 04.534 x3-3779 03-1785 03-3786 03-3789 02-to72 03.3I2I o2-t720 03.3474 04-876 04-877 04-883 0 4 - r42 04.1362 0?-?537 0l-2491 04-197 04-198 04-418 04-1167 0l-1347 0l-419 0l-1880 04-2003 03.475 I 04" 850 + 03- 709 1 0 l - ? 0 8 7* * 0l-2104 + 0l-225? + 03-2251 * 03"2256 * 03-230(r 0 l - 2 587 * 0 l - 2 5 9 0* 0 3 . 2 5 9+ 9 * 0l-2604 r 03-2607 * 0l-?917 0 3 - 1 4 0* 2 0 3 " 3 . 5 3i, 4 0 3 - 1 5 3* 9 0 3 - 3 5 6* 1

02-987 02-2963 0?-939 04-1 03-4108

L i k i t a F. Taylorv. BayerCorp. v, B i l l i e Joyce Crutchcr BayerCorp.,et al. J o h nDavisOdom,Jr. v. BayerCorp.,et al. Corp,et al. et D a r r c l lWayreCapelle, al- v. BrLydr et C h r i s t yBradshaw, al. v. BayerCorp. D3-41t4 Corp. T i n r c t h yLlndh v. I3ayer dt 03-41l5 P s t t yPadgett, al. v. lltryerCorp. O b i eBryant,et dl. v. BayerCorp, 03-41l E 0t-10694 L i n d aKing, et al. v. BayorCorp. v. Armendarez Wyoth,lnc., et al. 03-6879 M a r g a r i t a ct Corp-, al. 02-723 H f f m a n Williamsv. NovartisPharmaceuticals 03-5244 W i l s o nJ, Trent,Jr. v. BayerCorpet 04-1037 P a u l aMcDonaldv, UayerCorp-r al. 04-1040 P a u l i n e Claxtonv. Wyeth,et al. Ausler,et. v. Wyeth,Inc, 04-190 C a m e r o n 03.344 . ShirleyClarkv. Bryer cotp., et al, Jqmes McElroy,etc.v. B4yetCorp,,et al. 04-t03 etc. Corp.,et al02+98 H o l e nPipes, v. AnericanHomcProducts 03-470 E m m i tPaigcv. BayerCorp,,et al. $-t327 v. J o h n n i e Jeffcrson IjflyerCorp.,et alE. 0l-1328 D e b r aDeanTaylorv- BflyerCorp.,et al. Inc.,et al, Jr03-1340 G i l b e r tLeonCrumbley, v. NorvallisCon$uftctHefllth, Ihc.,et nl. Consunter A l g e r o nOdellPage Novartis Health, 04-t 86 v. etc, 03-198 l d e zchatm8n, v. BayerCorp.,et nl, Ewing, al.v. Wyeth, al. et 02-586 M e l i s s a et etc. 03-2155 J o s e p h Inc.,ct al Zennard, v. Wyetlr, 04-1016 T e r r yLindholmv. BayerCory. 0?-461B M a r i allarris v. KrogerTcxns,LP, et al. Corp., dl, et L. 04-59E P a m c l a Crowe Bayer v, Horne Products Foster, al, v. Amorican et Corp.,et al. 02't7l Ad6line But.ler BayerCorpv. 03-74 Charlotte corp.,ct al. 01-212 et B i l l i eR. Iackson, flI.v. Bayer 02-18 E d d i eH. Ratliff v. ItnyerCorp. 02-18 A d e l l Brownv. Btyer Corp. Caroll,n Palmer Bayu Corp.,et al. v. 02-lE Corp. v. 0?-2954 A l a nStockdale Bayer 02-?14 E v e l y nMutry, etc,v. BayerCorp. 02,214 r:t Corp. B o b b i e Quinn, al.v. Uayer Sue B r a d yNeedham BayerCorp. 0?-39 v, Iflgrsmv. BayerCorp. 0?-39 Florcncc 02-39 L a c i eJones BaycrCorpv. v. 03-30? Jarnc$ Whitdker BayerCorp.,ct al. 03-78 S a n d rThomas BklckDrugCo.,et al, a v. 03-t?4 M a r y Ann I{arveyv. Rlocklrrug Co.,I|rc.,et a]. PLC, et al. 03-124 et K e i t hWilliam Doncgan, al. v. GlaxoSmithKlitte, 03-124 Tammie Taylorv. BldckDrugCo.,Inc.,et al-

Case 4:03-cv-04114-JLH

Document 5

Filed 03/14/2006

Page 3 of 3

SCHEDIJLE FORCONDITIONALREMAND ORDER MDL.I4O7 --TRANSFEREE*DIST, DIV. E.A.I{O. --TRANSI'EROR.-DIST. DIY.E A.!IO.

2 PAGE OF2

CASE CAPfION v. Corp.,et al. I f e b r aRichardson Bs.yer v. O t l e a l Parker Block DnrgCo,,Inc.,et al. O d e l lCavin,ct al. v. IlayerCorp.,c( al. et C h r r r l eHnnnah, al. v. BaydrCorp.,et als ct BayerCorp-, al. Barbara Owcns-Hallv. Thomas BayorCorp.,et al. v. Courtney Barbara Adam,etc.v. BayerCorp.,et al. Corp, Minnie Swiftv. Bayor

wAw wAw wAw wAw wAw

? 2 ? 2 ?

IVAW 2

wAw 2 waw 2

0 3 - 3 5 7{' MSS 0 + 0 3 - 3 5 7 4 MS$ 0 3 - 3 6 1r, MSS 4 MSS 03-3617+ '" 0 3 - 3 6 2 8 MSS 0 3 - 3 6 4* M$S 5 0 3 - 3 6 5*0 MSS 0 4 - E 5 E + MSN

5 03-124 5 03-124 ? 03-E2 2 03-82 2 03-'14 2 03-74 2 03-74 4 03-415

* WAW oase in l)i$trictof Washington. number orderwasissucd Western wasassigned aller severnnce