Noiel v. Jones et al

Filing 2

ORDER directing the clerk to file the complaint with matter of plaintiff's status as a pauper to be determined at a later date; directing clerk to mail Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order and giving plaintiff 30 days in which to have an authorized officer at the institution complete the certificate and return the application for review . Signed by Judge Bobby E. Shepherd on 4/7/06. (cap)

Download PDF
Noiel v. Jones et al Doc. 2 Case 4:06-cv-04025-HFB Document 2 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 COUR'I' DISTR]CT I N ' I ' H T LNITED STATES O]I WESTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS T E X N R K A N ADIVISI()N D, J E F F R E Y NOIEI, PLAINTIFF L l i v iNo.06- 4 o es l Arkansas Parole J A L I KJONES, MARY NODLJRf FI, Assistant Ollicer; and Administrator; A.L Parole Director.Arkansas LOCKHART, Dcpartme nof (lorrcctions t DEFENDANI'S OR]DNR clcrkis The a for Plailtiff hassubmitted filing in thisdistrict pto sccornplaint. districl h e r e b ytlirectcdto file rhe complaint. The mattcr of plainlill's statusasa pauperwillbe dctcrmined i r t a later date. T h c plaintiffhas failcd to supplyan applicationto proctcd in.formapauperis. Accordingly, trt t h e district clerk is directe<l mail to plaintiff arrapplication,along with a copy of this order, arrcl p ) a i n t i f f i s given thirty (30) daysirr which to havean authorizedofficer at the institution complele t h c certifioate and retru'nthe application for revicw. IF PLAINTIFF W I T H THIS ORDER WITIIIN I'AILS TO COMPLY THE REQUIRED PNRIOD OF TIME' HIS CASE FOR F'AILLIRE TO PROSECI]TE A G A I N S T DEFI,NDANTS WILL BE DTSMISStr)D A N D / O R OBEY A COI]RT ORDER, I T IS S(] ORDFRED this Tth day ol April 2006' wesr'rDJpffifrcno#fiTnsns lefr A P R I 2006 I CHBIR,JOfiNStr'I, S CTERK JUDGE I JNIIED STATES MA(iISl'RN'I'E 0*ffi',** AO7?A (Rev.8/82) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?