Noiel v. Jones et al
Filing
2
ORDER directing clerk to file petition, with matter of petitioner's status as a pauper to be determined at a later date; finding petitioner has failed to supply application to proceed in forma pauperis; accordingly, directing clerk to mail petitioner an application and a copy of this order, and giving petitioner 30 days to complete application and return to court for review . Signed by Judge Bobby E. Shepherd on 4/17/06. (cap)
Noiel v. Jones et al
Doc. 2
Case 4:06-cv-04031-HFB
Document 2
Filed 04/20/2006
Page 1 of 1
I N THE I'NITED SIIATES DISTRICT COURT I{ESTERN DISTRXCT OF A.RIIIIIVSAS T E I { S R K A N A DIVISION
, ] E F F R E Y DEWAYNENOTEJL
vs. JACK JONES, Fafole A,L. LLCI{HART, and Civ11 No. 06-
PETTT-IONEIt
Of ficer; MARTY NODURTH
RF]SPONDENTS
ORDER
Petitioner.
a pri scner
aL the Institutionaf p. Clements. Jr. for writ of
Division Unit.
of
the Texas Texas, 28
DeFartment of .Iustice, Arkartsas, ILS.C. directed hae submitted
Wiffiam
AmarifLo,
a petitiofl in this
habeas corpus cferk
under
5 2254 for: filing to fife
district. The matter date.
The district
is hereby dF a
the petition.
of petitioner,s
status
pauper will
be deterrnined
aE a fater to
The petitioner forma pauperis. petitioner petititnef of f i.ccr: at apprication an is the for
has faiLed
supply
an application clerk a copy to is
to proceed
in
Accordingly. appli.caticn, given thirty
the djstricr along (30) with
directed of this
td rnai'l to order, and
days
rln which the
have
an author:j.zed return rErs the oRDER
institution review.
complete
certificate
and
rF PETTTToNER FArrrs To collprJy wrrlr
W T T H I N TIIE FEQUIRED PERIOD OF TII,S,
HTS CASE A,GAINSf TIIE RESPONDEMTS
W I I J I J BE DISMTSSED f,OR FAILTIRE TO PROSEEU'IE A.!ID/OR OBEY A COI'RT ORDER. IT IS SO ORDEREDhiE t 1?th daw of an|i 1 2006.
wrsTUEF,!BFlfr*%"Y,['Ns^*
A P R 0 2006 ?
r Y
C H B8.J0lNSoli IS CLERK
HON. BOBBYE. HERIJ U N I T E D STATES M A G STIi,A'I'IJ,]UDGE I
J
DEFS{ CrEnK
AO7zA ( R e v .8/82)
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?