Green v. Texarkana, Arkansas, City of et al
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; Texarkana, Arkansas, City of terminated. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on May 14, 2009. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
BOBBIE GREEN
PLAINTIFF
VS.
CASE NO. 07-CV-4032
CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS and Todd Harness (Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Texarkana)
DEFENDANTS
ORDER Before the Court is a Substitute Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of Defendants City of Texarkana, Arkansas, ("City") and Todd Harness and Holly Monroe, individually and in their official capacity as police officers for the City of Texarkana, Arkansas. (Doc. 38). Plaintiff Bobbie Green has responded. (Doc. 43). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. For reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment should be and hereby is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is granted with regard to Defendants City of Texarkana, Arkansas and Defendants Todd Harness and Holly Monroe in their official capacity as police officers for the City of Texarkana. Plaintiff's official capacity claims against all Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is also granted with regard to Plaintiff's claim of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Todd Harness and Holly Monroe individually are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED with regard to Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim against Defendants Todd Harness and Holly Monroe individually. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of May, 2009. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?