Brasel et al vs. Weyerhaeuser Company et al

Filing 304

ORDER dismissing Plaintiff Betty Simmons' claims against Defendants per failure to respond as directed to 301 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 28, 2014. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION RHONDA BRASEL, Individually and as Next Best Friend and Guardian of Christopher Albright and Nathan K. Thomas, et al V. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 4:07cv4037 WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY and DOES 1 through 100 DEFENDANTS ORDER On February 7, 2014, the Court entered an Order granting a Motion to Withdraw filed by Plaintiff Betty Simmons’ counsels. (ECF No. 297). In this motion, the Court ordered Simmons to notify the Court within 30 days whether she intended to proceed pro se in this matter or with new counsel. The Court mailed copies of the Order to Simmons. On March 11, 2014, the Court ordered Simmons to show cause to the Court why she had not responded to the Court’s February 7, 2014 Order and why her claims against Defendants should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 301). Simmons’ response to the show cause order was due on March 25, 2014. The Order stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal. The Court mailed a copy of the Order to Simmons. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Show Cause Order and has failed to comply with the Court’s February 7, 2014 Order. Accordingly, the Court finds that Simmons’ claims against Defendants should be and hereby are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of March, 2014. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?