Ward v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 118

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re 116 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by John Ward, Jr. See attached document for specifics. (cap)

Ward v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Doc. 118

Case 4:08-cv-04022-JLH Document 118

Filed 10/14/09 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JOHN WARD, JR. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. NOTICE RE DEFICIENCY Plaintiff JOHN WARD, JR. filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the above entitled proceeding on October 13, 2009, Document #116, which appears to contain one or more deficiencies as indicated. 1. 2. 3. Pleading is not signed in compliance with Local Rule 5.5(c)(1). Pleading is not completely retyped in compliance with Local Rule 5.5(e). Pleading does not comply with Local Rule 6.2(b) - Motions for extension of time statement that adverse party has been contacted. Pleading is not in compliance with Local Rule 7.2. 1. 2. 3. No brief in support Not set forth in separate pleading - see Other below No statement re conference with opposing counsel (motions to compel discovery, discovery enforcement motions, and motions for protective orders) No. 08-4022 DEFENDANT(S) PLAINTIFF(S)

4.

5.

X

Pleading is not in compliance with Local Rule 56.1 (Summary Judgment Motions). 1. 2. No brief in support No separate Statement of Facts

X 6. 7.

No certificate of service or explanation why service is not required. FRCvP 5(d). Other. .

YOU ARE DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY FILE A STATEMENT OF FACTS TO REMEDY THIS DEFICIENCY. cc: Judge Hendren

Dockets.Justia.com