Ward v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
ORDER granting 90 Motion to Stay. Cisco's compliance with the August 24, 2009 Order is hereby stayed pending a ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 2, 2009. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JOHN WARD, JR. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. ORDER Now on this 2nd day of September, 2009, comes on for Civil No. 08-4022 DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
consideration Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Brief in Support (doc. 90) and the response thereto. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows: 1. In the instant matter, the plaintiff asserts a claim for
defamation against Cisco Systems, Inc. (hereinafter "Cisco"). The claim for defamation stems from publications on an internet blog www.trolltracker.blogspot.com. The blog was published by
Richard Frenkel,1 who was then employed by Cisco. allegedly accused the plaintiff, an attorney, of
The blog "criminal
conduct, unethical conduct, and conduct unbefitting of an officer of the Court." 2. On March 30, 2009, the Court ruled on Plaintiff Ward's
Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1-9 (document #57). The Court's Order of March 30, 2009 (document #60) granted
See Frenkel's Declaration of May 11, 2009 (document 63-2).
Ward's motion and ordered Cisco to respond to the interrogatories, as directed within fifteen (15) days. 3. On August 24, 2009, the Court entered an Order ruling on
Plaintiff Ward's Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's March 30, 2009 Order and For Sanctions (document #61). The Order
(document #89) granted plaintiff's motion in part and ordered Cisco to produce to Ward all documents, emails and written
communications written by or received by Frenkel prior to October 19, 2007. 4. In the instant motion, Cisco now seeks a stay of the
August 24, 2009 Order pending appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Cisco seeks the stay to delay production of the
documents, emails and written communications, which it contends constitute privileged information. 5. In his response to Cisco's motion, Ward argues that he
opposes a stay pending a writ of mandamus, but instead believes the Court should or reconsider pursuant to its a order for clarity and/or for
reconsideration by Cisco.
However, considering the fact that
Cisco has now filed its Petition for Writ of Mandamus with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court will not reconsider its order at this time and will, instead, await ruling from that Court. Accordingly, the Court finds that the instant motion Cisco's compliance with
should be, and it hereby is, granted. -2-
August 24, 2009 Order is hereby stayed pending a ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?