Womack v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 55

ORDER for reasons set forth in the 54 Memorandum Opinion, Defendant's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's claim under the Federal Safety Appliance Act is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 26, 2012. (mfr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JAMES W. WOMACK v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:09-CV-04116 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (ECF No. 35). Plaintiff has filed a response (ECF No. 49) and Defendant has replied. (ECF No. 52). Upon consideration, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s claim under the Federal Safety Appliance Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20301 et seq., is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, on this 26th day of March, 2012. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Hon. Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?