Cain et al v. Nevada County School District

Filing 30

JUDGMENT re 29 that plaintiffs' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; further this case is dismissed with prejudice and parties are instructed to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 20, 2011. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION DONNA CAIN AND STEVE ROGIAN v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:10-CV-04011 NEVADA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANT JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Donna Cain and Steve Rogian’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is DENIED, and Defendant Nevada County School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. This case is accordingly dismissed with prejudice, and the parties are instructed to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December 2011. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?