Cain et al v. Nevada County School District
JUDGMENT re 29 that plaintiffs' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; further this case is dismissed with prejudice and parties are instructed to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 20, 2011. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DONNA CAIN AND STEVE ROGIAN
Case No. 4:10-CV-04011
NEVADA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Donna Cain and Steve Rogian’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is DENIED, and Defendant Nevada County School District’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. This case is accordingly dismissed with
prejudice, and the parties are instructed to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December 2011.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?