Cain et al v. Nevada County School District

Filing 30

JUDGMENT re 29 that plaintiffs' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; further this case is dismissed with prejudice and parties are instructed to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 20, 2011. (rw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
DONNA CAIN AND STEVE ROGIAN
v.

PLAINTIFFS

Case No. 4:10-CV-04011

NEVADA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Donna Cain and Steve Rogian’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is DENIED, and Defendant Nevada County School District’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. This case is accordingly dismissed with
prejudice, and the parties are instructed to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December 2011.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE