NET2PHONE, INC. v. EBAY, INC. et al
Filing
178
ORDER On Informal Application for the deposition of Mr. Cohen to be completed no later than 3/14/08 in either N.J. or California; deposition of the other Vocal Tech shall take place on 2/6/08 and for the resumed deposition of Mr. Oberg shall take place in London during the week of 2/4/08 etc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz on 1/31/08(cs, ) [Transferred from njd on 6/24/2010.]
NET2PHONE, INC. v. EBAY, INC. et al
Doc. 178
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NET2PHONE, INC. Plaintiffs, v. EBAY, INC., et al. : : : : : : : : :
Civil Action No. 06-2469 (KSH)
ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION
Defendants.
This matter having come before the Court for a telephone conference on the record on February 1, 2008, regarding the depositions of representatives of Vocal Tech and Messrs. Sauer and Oberg; and the Court having considered the arguments and representations of the parties as well as the record of proceedings; and for the reasons set forth on the record on February 1, 2008; and for good cause shown, IT IS ON THIS 1st day of February, 2008 ORDERED that the deposition of Mr. Cohen shall be completed no later than March 14, 2008 in either New Jersey or California, which ever is more convenient for the witness; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deposition of the other Vocal Tech witness shall take place on February 6, 2008. The plaintiff has reserved the right to re-open this deposition if the motion for reconsideration is granted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the resumed deposition of Mr. Oberg shall take place in London during the week of February 4, 2008, in a conference room acceptable to the parties and shall last no longer than two hours and fifteen minutes;
Dockets.Justia.com
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall produce the documents of Mr. Sauer as soon as they are received, but in no event later than February 5, 2008.
s/Patty Shwartz UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?