Plumley v. Service King Manufacturing Inc.
Filing
58
JUDGMENT granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment against Gary and Anita Plumley and Service King; denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment against Young Well Service; Service King Manufacturings claims against Young Well Service Company are DISMISS ED WITH PREJUDICE. Gary and Anita Plumley's claims against Young Well Service Company are also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Third Party Plaintiff Service King Manufacturing Inc., Third Party Defendant Young Well Service Company, Inc., Cross Defendant Young Well Service Company, Inc., Cross Claimants Anita Plumley and Gary Plumley terminated. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on October 17, 2011. (cap)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
GARY and ANITA PLUMLEY
VS.
PLAINTIFFS
CASE NO. 10-CV-4108
YOUNG WELL SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
DEFENDANT/
THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT
SERVICE KING MANUFACTURING, INC.
DEFENDANT/
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF/
INTERVENOR DEFENDANT
VS.
YOUNG WELL SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT
AGCS MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY,
AS SUBROGEE OF YOUNG WELL
SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
INTERVENOR PLAINTIFF
JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs Gary and Anita Plumley filed an Amended Complaint against Defendants Service
King Manufacturing, Inc. (“Service King”) and Young Well Service Company, Inc. (“Young Well
Service”). (ECF No. 43). Defendant Service King filed a Third Party Complaint against coDefendant Young Well Service. (ECF. No. 11). This matter is now before the Court on Service
King and Young Well Service’s cross-motions for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 27 and 36). Both
Service King and Young Well Service have responded. (ECF No. 35 and 50). Both parties have
replied. (ECF No. 50 and 52). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. For the reasons
discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Young Well Service
1
Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Gary and Anita Plumley and Service King (ECF
No. 27) is GRANTED. Service King’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) against
Young Well Service should be and hereby is DENIED. Service King Manufacturing’s claims
against Young Well Service Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Gary and Anita
Plumley’s claims against Young Well Service Company are also DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of October, 2011.
/s/ Harry F. Barnes
Hon. Harry F. Barnes
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?