White v. Stoval et al
JUDGMENT ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 38 Report and Recommendations and granting 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to separate Defendants Ron Stovall and Gary Turner; Plaintiff's claims are dismissed as to defendants Stova ll and Turner; adopting Report and Recommendations re 39 Report and Recommendations, and granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Williams; Plaintiff's claims as to Defendant Williams are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 18, 2012. (cap) Modified on 1/18/2012 to edit text (cap).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ERIC L. WHITE
Civil No. 4:10-CV-04116
SHERIFF RON STOVALL, et al.
Before the Court are the Report and Recommendations filed December 29, 2011, by the
Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District
of Arkansas. (ECF Nos. 38 and 39). Judge Marschewski recommends that the motion for judgment
on the pleadings (ECF No. 23) be granted as to Stovall and Turner and the motion for summary
judgment (ECF No. 26) be granted as to Williams. The parties have not filed objections to the Report
and Recommendations, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the
Court adopts the Report and Recommendations in toto.
Plaintiff’s claims as to separate Defendant Williams are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims as to separate Defendants Ron Stovall and Gary Turner are DISMISSED.
The motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of January, 2012.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Hon. Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?