Woodberry v. Stovall et al

Filing 43

JUDGMENT dismissing case based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order and her failure to prosecute this action. Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 6, 2012. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION DEMETRA NEWTON WOODBERRY v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:10-cv-04141 SHERIFF RON STOVALL; CAPTAIN STEVE HARTHINE, Miller County Correctional Facility; and CAPTAIN JACK HEINTZLEMAN, Miller County Detention Center DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT This is a civil rights case filed pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. The case is before me due to the consent of the parties (ECF No. 28). By scheduling order (ECF No. 29) entered on June 20, 2011, this case was scheduled for a bench trial on February 16, 2012. The scheduling order required Plaintiff to submit a list of witnesses that she wanted the Court to issue subpoenas or writs for. This list was to be filed by no later than January 17, 2012. On January 23, 2012, a show cause order (ECF no. 42) was issued. Plaintiff was given until January 31, 2012, to show cause why the case should not be dismissed based on her failure to obey an order of the Court and her failure to prosecute. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the scheduling order or the show cause order. She has not requested an extension of time to respond. The Court’s orders were sent to the address contained on the docket sheet. This address was provided to the Court by Plaintiff. No mail has been returned as undeliverable. This case is therefore dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and her failure to prosecute this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of February 2012. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?