Scott v. Stovall et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 33 Amended Report and Recommendations, finding as moot 32 Report and Recommendations, granting 9 Motion to Dismiss filed by T. Green, Ms. Bobby, granting 25 Motion to Dismiss filed by Sgt. Jile s, Sgt. Baliss, Ron Stovall, Sgt. Rags, Sgt. Lafayette, Sgt. Miller, Sgt. Welch, Captain Hartline, and case is dismissed with prejudice. Case is also dismissed with prejudice as to Jack Heintzleman. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on June 21, 2011. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 4:10-CV-04153
SHERIFF RON STOVALL; CAPTAIN
HARTLINE; CAPTAIN HEINTZLEMAN;
SGT. BALISS; SGT. LAFAYETTE; SGT.
GILES; SGT. RAGS; SGT. WELCH;
SGT. MILLER; MS. BOBBY, Aramark;
and T. GREEN, Aramark
O R D E R
consideration the Amended Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) filed
in this case on April 26, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant,
United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas.
Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by
Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Motions to Dismiss filed by
Ms. Bobby and T. Green (Doc. 9) and all remaining defendants except
Captain Heintzleman (Doc. 25) are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Jack Heintzleman has been served but has
constitutional violation exists, the claims against Heintzleman are
Recommendation (Doc. 33) supersedes the Report and Recommendation
that had been previously filed (Doc. 32), the previously filed
Report and Recommendation is hereby TERMINATED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June 2011.
/s/Paul K. Holmes, III
PAUL K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?