Morrison v. Hartline et al
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65 ; granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; Nurse Williams, Steve Hartline, Johnny Welch, and Jack Heintzleman dismissed; leaving for later resolution the claim against Separate Defendant Dealfred Colquitt. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 5, 2012. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
COTY JAMES MORRISON
V.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-4154
CAPTAIN HARTLINE; SGT.
WELCH; DEALFRED COLQUITT;
NURSE WILLIAMS; and
CAPT. JACK HEINTZLEMAN
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 14, 2012 by the Honorable
Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 65).
Judge Bryant recommends granting Separate Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. (ECF
Nos. 36 and 41). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the
time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in toto.
Nurse Williams’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) and Separate Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 41) are GRANTED. Nurse Williams, Steve Hartline,
Johnny Welch, and Jack Heintzleman are hereby dismissed from this action. This leaves for later
resolution the claim against Separate Defendant Dealfred Colquitt.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 5th day of September, 2012.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Hon. Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?