Williams v. Adams et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations, and Plaintiff's claims against separate defendants Inmate Stevie Evans and Inmate Kelly Hancock are dismissed with prejudice. Stevie Evans and Kelly Hancock terminated. Additionally, any claims based on Defendants alleged failure to bring criminal charges are also subject to dismissal. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on May 3, 2011. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
TRACY WILLIAMS
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 4:10-CV-04194
OFFICER ADAMS, Miller County
Correctional Facility (MCCF);
OFFICER WILKERSON, MCCF; SGT. WELCH,
MCCF; SGT. ELLOITE, MCCF; INMATE
STEVIE EVANS, Incarcerated at the
MCCF; NURSE WILLIAMS, MCCF; INMATE
KELLY HANCOCK, Incarcerated at the
Varner Unit of the Arkansas
Department of Correction; and CPL.
LAFAYETTE, MCCF
DEFENDANTS
O R D E R
On this 3rd day of May 2011, there comes on for consideration
the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 9) filed in this case on April
21,
2011,
by
the
Honorable
Barry
A.
Bryant,
Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas.
United
States
Also before the
Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 11).
The
court
has
reviewed
this
case
and,
being
well
and
sufficiently advised, finds as follows: Plaintiff’s objections
offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and
Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation is proper and should
be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s claims against separate
defendants
Inmate
Stevie
Evans
and
Inmate
Kelly
Hancock
are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, any claims based on a
Defendant’s alleged failure to bring criminal charges are also
subject to dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of May 2011.
/s/ Paul K. Holmes III
Paul K. Holmes III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?