Williams v. Adams et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations, and Plaintiff's claims against separate defendants Inmate Stevie Evans and Inmate Kelly Hancock are dismissed with prejudice. Stevie Evans and Kelly Hancock terminated. Additionally, any claims based on Defendants alleged failure to bring criminal charges are also subject to dismissal. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on May 3, 2011. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION TRACY WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:10-CV-04194 OFFICER ADAMS, Miller County Correctional Facility (MCCF); OFFICER WILKERSON, MCCF; SGT. WELCH, MCCF; SGT. ELLOITE, MCCF; INMATE STEVIE EVANS, Incarcerated at the MCCF; NURSE WILLIAMS, MCCF; INMATE KELLY HANCOCK, Incarcerated at the Varner Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction; and CPL. LAFAYETTE, MCCF DEFENDANTS O R D E R On this 3rd day of May 2011, there comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 9) filed in this case on April 21, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. United States Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 11). The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s claims against separate defendants Inmate Stevie Evans and Inmate Kelly Hancock are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, any claims based on a Defendant’s alleged failure to bring criminal charges are also subject to dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of May 2011. /s/ Paul K. Holmes III Paul K. Holmes III United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?