Evans v. Hartline

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Report and Recommendations, denying 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stevie Evans. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Further directing the clerk to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on June 23, 2011. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION STEVIE EVANS PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:11-CV-04024 CAPTAIN HARTLINE DEFENDANT O R D E R On this 23rd day of June 2011, there comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) filed in this case on April 26, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the well and parties. The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 4-5) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The dismissal of this case constitutes a strike under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk is therefore directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of June 2011. /s/Paul K. Holmes, III PAUL K. HOLMES, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?