Evans v. Hartline

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Report and Recommendations, denying 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stevie Evans. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Further directing the clerk to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on June 23, 2011. (cap)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
STEVIE EVANS

PLAINTIFF

v.

Case No. 4:11-CV-04024

CAPTAIN HARTLINE

DEFENDANT
O R D E R

On

this

23rd

day

of

June

2011,

there

comes

on

for

consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) filed in this
case on April 26, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United
States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen
(14) days

have

passed

without

objections

being

filed

by

the

well

and

parties.
The

court

sufficiently

has

reviewed

advised,

finds

this
as

case

and,

follows:

being
The

Report

and

Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s request to proceed
in forma pauperis (Docs. 4-5) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s claims are
hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The dismissal of this case constitutes a strike under the
Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk is
therefore directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of June 2011.

/s/Paul K. Holmes, III
PAUL K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE