Judd v. Secretary of State of Arkansas et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 Report and Recommendations; denying 6 Motion to Waive Filing Fees; denying 7 Motion to Waive Filing Fees; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) as well as for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Furthermore, the Plaintiff is BARRED from any further filings in this Court without first obtaining leave of a United States District Judge of this Court. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 6, 2011. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Case No. 4:11-CV-04049
SECRETARY OF STATE OF ARKANSAS;
and STATE OF ARKANSAS
On this 6th day of September 2011, there comes on for consideration the Report and
Recommendations (Doc. 10) filed in this case on July 7, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant,
United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s
objections (Doc. 11).
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and
Recommendations. The Court finds that dismissal of Plaintiff’s case remains appropriate. The Report
and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations,
Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) and Motions to Waive Filing Fees (Docs.
6 and 7) are all DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant
to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) as well as for failure to comply with an Order
of this Court. Furthermore, the Plaintiff is BARRED from any further filings in this Court without
first obtaining leave of a United States District Judge of this Court. This restriction does not apply
to any allegation of imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Court further certifies, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Dismissal would not
be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of September 2011.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?