Hall v. Jones et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations, and Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on October 26, 2011. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION TOMMY HALL V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 11-CV-4055 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY CARLTON JONES; KATE CARTER, Prosecuting Attorney; J. SAVAGE, Seizing Officer; STATE OF ARKANSAS; and GENE SMITH, Director, State Drug Director’s Office DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 27, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 14). Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed with prejudice because the claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff has responded with objections. (ECF No. 16). After reviewing the record de novo, the Court adopts Judge Bryant’s Report and Recommendation as its own. The magistrate judge found that this case is subject to dismissal as the claims are barred by the statute of limitations. The Court has reviewed Thompson’s objections to the magistrate judge’s findings, and the Court finds that the objections are without merit. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Judge Bryant’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of October, 2011. /s/ Harry F. Barnes Hon. Harry F. Barnes United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?