Canopius Capital Two Limited et al v. Jeanne Estates Apartments, Inc. et al

Filing 157

ORDER directing Plaintiffs to submit proof of service as to Steve Johnson and Steve Johnson d/b/a The Cooker or show cause why claims against these separate defendants should not be dismissed. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 4, 2016. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
CANOPIUS CAPITAL TWO LIMITED, et al

VS.

PLAINTIFFS

CASE NO. 11-CV-4070

JEANNE ESTATES APARTMENTS, INC.,
et al

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On August 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 136).
Following the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion for
Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 143). In each of these filings, Plaintiffs’ certificate of service
indicates that the papers were electronically served to the other parties in this case, either through
the CM/ECF system or by e-mail. However, Separate Defendants Steve Johnson and Steve
Johnson d/b/a The Cooker are proceeding pro se in this case (ECF No. 74), and the Court is
unaware of any consent by Steve Johnson to receive electronic service. There is nothing on the
docket to indicate that Plaintiffs have served these Separate Defendants via the P.O. Box address
listed for Steve Johnson in the Court’s CM/ECF system.
The Court directs Plaintiffs to submit their proof of service as to these Separate
Defendants on or before Tuesday, February 9, 2016. If service of the filings mentioned above
was never completed upon these Separate Defendants, Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show
cause why the claims against these Separate Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to
effectuate service and/or failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 4th day of February, 2016.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge