Catalina London Limited v. Jeanne Estates Apartments, Inc. et al

Filing 111

ORDER denying as moot 106 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 31, 2015. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION

CATALINA LONDON LIMITED
F/K/A ALEA LONDON LIMITED

VS.

PLAINTIFFS

CASE NO. 11-CV-4091

JEANNE ESTATES APARTMENTS, INC.,
et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Before the Court is Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 106) filed on behalf of Defendant
Cherry Hill Printing Company, Inc.

Plaintiff Catalina London Limited f/k/a Alea London

Limited (“Catalina”) has filed a response. (ECF No. 107). The Court finds this matter ripe for
consideration.
Cherry Hill Printing moves to dismiss Catalina’s action for declaratory judgment as to the
underlying case Kolbek, et al. v. Twenty-First Century Holiness Tabernacle Church, Inc. et al.,
Case No. 4:10-cv-04124. Cherry Hill Printing argues that, because it was dismissed from the
Kolbek suit, there is no remaining controversy between the parties as to the Kolbek suit. In
response to the motion, Catalina points out that it has already stated on the record that it is no
longer seeking a declaratory judgment as to Cherry Hill Printing with respect to the Kolbek
action. (ECF No. 105, p. 3). Accordingly, the Court finds that the motion (ECF No. 106) should
be and hereby is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 31st day of March, 2015.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge