Johnson v. Stringfellow, et al

Filing 84

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 83 Report and Recommendations; granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Dr. Devlin are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 27, 2015. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION LONNIE JOHNSON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:11-cv-04099 DR. DEVLIN, Jail Doctor, Sevier County Jail DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 6, 2015, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 83). This lawsuit originally contained multiple defendants. Those defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 29). The Court granted in part and denied in part the motion, dismissing all claims except two individual capacity claims against Defendant Dr. Devlin. (ECF No. 58). The Court referred the matter back to Judge Bryant for the consideration of Plaintiff Lonnie Johnson’s individual capacity claims against Dr. Devlin for delay of medical care regarding Johnson’s blood pressure and denial of medical care regarding Johnson’s alleged diabetes. After consideration, Judge Bryant recommends Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) on these remaining claims be granted. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Dr. Devlin are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 27th day of July, 2015. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?