Basham et al v. American National County Mutual Ins Co et al
Filing
234
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 227 Motion to Stay. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on November 14, 2013. (mll)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
EDDIE BASHAM, as administrator
of the estate of James Basham, and
FREDA MCCLENDON, individually
and as class representatives on behalf
of all similarly situated persons
V.
PLAINTIFFS
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-4005
AMERICAN NATIONAL COUNTY
MUTUAL INS. CO., et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is an Agreed Motion to Stay filed on behalf of Plaintiffs and Certain
Defendants. (ECF No. 227). Defendants who did not join the motion have filed a response in opposition.
(ECF No. 231). The matter is ripe for the Court’s consideration.
On October 23, 2013, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. (ECF
No. 225). On November 4, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Petition for Leave to Appeal the Court’s order to the
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c). (ECF No. 228). The movants request
that this litigation be stayed until 30 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on Plaintiffs’ petition, and if
the petition is accepted, until 30 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on the ensuing appeal.
Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for a stay of proceedings has been shown.
Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 227) should be and hereby is GRANTED in part and DENIED in
part. This case is hereby stayed until 7 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on Plaintiffs’ petition for
leave to appeal. If the petition is accepted, this case is stayed until 7 days after the Eighth Circuit has
ruled on the appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of November, 2013.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?