Basham et al v. American National County Mutual Ins Co et al

Filing 234

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 227 Motion to Stay. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on November 14, 2013. (mll)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION EDDIE BASHAM, as administrator of the estate of James Basham, and FREDA MCCLENDON, individually and as class representatives on behalf of all similarly situated persons V. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 4:12-CV-4005 AMERICAN NATIONAL COUNTY MUTUAL INS. CO., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is an Agreed Motion to Stay filed on behalf of Plaintiffs and Certain Defendants. (ECF No. 227). Defendants who did not join the motion have filed a response in opposition. (ECF No. 231). The matter is ripe for the Court’s consideration. On October 23, 2013, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 225). On November 4, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Petition for Leave to Appeal the Court’s order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c). (ECF No. 228). The movants request that this litigation be stayed until 30 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on Plaintiffs’ petition, and if the petition is accepted, until 30 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on the ensuing appeal. Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for a stay of proceedings has been shown. Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 227) should be and hereby is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. This case is hereby stayed until 7 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on Plaintiffs’ petition for leave to appeal. If the petition is accepted, this case is stayed until 7 days after the Eighth Circuit has ruled on the appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of November, 2013. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?